1952 Allard K2 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1999 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 1999 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1999 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Allard | Renault |
Model | K2 | Clio |
Year Released | 1952 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |