1952 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Audi TT
To start off, 2000 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Audi TT (180 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi TT weights approximately 110 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2000 Audi TT | |
| Make | Allard | Audi |
| Model | K2 | TT |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2430 mm |
