1952 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C (141 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 340 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2000 Mercedes-Benz C | |
| Make | Allard | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | K2 | C |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2146 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |
