1952 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 490 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2000 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2000 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Allard | Mitsubishi |
| Model | K2 | Minica |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2350 mm |
