1952 Allard K2 vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2000 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K2 | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
