1952 Allard K2 vs. 2000 TVR Griffith
To start off, 2000 TVR Griffith is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,988 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 TVR Griffith is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Griffith (320 HP) has 235 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 150 kg more than 2000 TVR Griffith.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2000 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Allard | TVR |
Model | K2 | Griffith |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 320 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2290 mm |