1952 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Nissan MM
To start off, 2001 Nissan MM is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan MM (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan MM should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan MM weights approximately 635 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
2001 Nissan MM has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan MM will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2001 Nissan MM | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K2 | MM |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1835 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 1530 mm |
