1952 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Opel Omega

To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Opel Omega weights approximately 395 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Allard K2 2001 Opel Omega
Make Allard Opel
Model K2 Omega
Year Released 1952 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3622 cc 2172 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 85 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1200 kg 1595 kg
Vehicle Length 4270 mm 4900 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2740 mm