1952 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2001 Toyota Condor is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Condor (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Condor weights approximately 246 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2001 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Allard | Toyota |
| Model | K2 | Condor |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1446 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2670 mm |
