1952 Allard K2 vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota RSC (194 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 196 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K2 | RSC |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1396 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |