1952 Allard K2 vs. 2002 Lada 2123
To start off, 2002 Lada 2123 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2002 Lada 2123. (76 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2002 Lada 2123. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lada 2123 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 2002 Lada 2123 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada 2123 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2002 Lada 2123 | |
| Make | Allard | Lada |
| Model | K2 | 2123 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1688 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2460 mm |
