1952 Allard K2 vs. 2002 Vauxhall Omega
To start off, 2002 Vauxhall Omega is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Vauxhall Omega (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Vauxhall Omega should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Vauxhall Omega weights approximately 460 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2002 Vauxhall Omega | |
| Make | Allard | Vauxhall |
| Model | K2 | Omega |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2740 mm |
