1952 Allard K2 vs. 2003 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2003 Dodge Dakota is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Dakota (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 336 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2003 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Allard | Dodge |
| Model | K2 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2458 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |
