1952 Allard K2 vs. 2003 Rover City
To start off, 2003 Rover City is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2003 Rover City. (84 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2003 Rover City. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Rover City. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2003 Rover City | |
| Make | Allard | Rover |
| Model | K2 | City |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 84 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
