1952 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 569 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Allard | Dodge |
| Model | K2 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 211 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2850 mm |
