1952 Allard K2 vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 590 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Allard | Isuzu |
Model | K2 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 250 HP |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2710 mm |