1952 Allard K2 vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2004 MG TF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MG TF (158 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2004 MG TF.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2004 MG TF | |
Make | Allard | MG |
Model | K2 | TF |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |