1952 Allard K2 vs. 2005 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Cherokee (147 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 664 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
2005 Jeep Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jeep Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2005 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K2 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 147 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1864 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |
