1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Audi A3
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 680 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2006 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Allard | Audi |
| Model | K2 | A3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1981 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
