1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet SSR (401 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2006 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2006 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | SSR |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 401 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2950 mm |