1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (78 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Allard | Isuzu |
| Model | K2 | KB |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2499 cc |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3060 mm |
