1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 207 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K2 (85 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2006 Peugeot 207. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K2 should accelerate faster than 2006 Peugeot 207.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2006 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Allard | Peugeot |
Model | K2 | 207 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1358 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1670 mm |