1952 Allard K2 vs. 2006 SSC Aero
To start off, 2006 SSC Aero is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 SSC Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SSC Aero (1,062 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 977 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SSC Aero should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SSC Aero weights approximately 93 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2006 SSC Aero | |
| Make | Allard | SSC |
| Model | K2 | Aero |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 1062 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1293 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2080 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1090 mm |
