1952 Allard K2 vs. 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt
To start off, 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt (171 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 122 kg more than 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2007 Chevrolet Cobalt | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Cobalt |
Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1078 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |