1952 Allard K2 vs. 2007 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2007 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2007 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2007 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 244 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2760 mm |
