1952 Allard K2 vs. 2008 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2008 Mazda Tribute is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2008 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Allard | Mazda |
| Model | K2 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2070 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |
