1952 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 650 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K2 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2990 mm |