1952 Allard K2 vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K2 weights approximately 126 kg more than 2009 Toyota Tundra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K2 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |