1952 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Nissan Navara
To start off, 2010 Nissan Navara is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Navara (172 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Navara weights approximately 832 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Nissan Navara is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Navara will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2010 Nissan Navara | |
| Make | Allard | Nissan |
| Model | K2 | Navara |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3210 mm |
