1952 Allard K2 vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Allard | Scion |
Model | K2 | tC |
Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |