1952 Allard K2 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado (186 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 1185 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2011 Chevrolet Colorado | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K2 | Colorado |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2830 mm |