1952 Allard K2 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Allard | Land Rover |
Model | K2 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2891 mm |