1952 Allard K2 vs. 2012 Peugeot 508
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 508 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 508 (201 HP) has 116 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2.
Because 1952 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 508, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Peugeot 508 has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K2 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot 508 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2012 Peugeot 508 | |
| Make | Allard | Peugeot |
| Model | K2 | 508 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4792 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1853 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1456 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2817 mm |
