1952 Allard K2 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Compass (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Compass weights approximately 320 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Allard | Jeep |
| Model | K2 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4448 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1811 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1651 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2634 mm |
