1952 Allard K2 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL (423 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 338 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 585 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K2 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Allard | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | K2 | SL |
Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 423 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1785 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4612 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2099 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1315 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2585 mm |