1952 Allard K2 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1952 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 718 kg more than 1952 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K2 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Allard | Volvo |
| Model | K2 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4627 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1891 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1713 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2774 mm |
