1952 Allard K3 vs. 1946 Simca 8
To start off, 1952 Allard K3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 8 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1946 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 256 kg more than 1946 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1946 Simca 8 | |
Make | Allard | Simca |
Model | K3 | 8 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 924 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |