1952 Allard K3 vs. 1950 Allard K2
To start off, 1952 Allard K3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Allard K2 would be higher. Both 1952 Allard K3 and 1950 Allard K2 are equipped with a 3,622 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1950 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Allard K2 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1950 Allard K2 | |
| Make | Allard | Allard |
| Model | K3 | K2 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3622 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |
