1952 Allard K3 vs. 1950 DKW F 89
To start off, 1952 Allard K3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1950 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Allard | DKW |
| Model | K3 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2360 mm |
