1952 Allard K3 vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1958 Cadillac 62 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K3 | 62 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1958 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4375 cc | 5980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |