1952 Allard K3 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 875 kg more than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Allard | Cadillac |
| Model | K3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 2055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 79 L |
