1952 Allard K3 vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 46 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications: