1952 Allard K3 vs. 1963 Porsche 356
To start off, 1963 Porsche 356 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 95 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1963 Porsche 356.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1963 Porsche 356 | |
Make | Allard | Porsche |
Model | K3 | 356 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 74 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 934 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |