1952 Allard K3 vs. 1964 Ferrari 158
To start off, 1964 Ferrari 158 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Ferrari 158 (208 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Ferrari 158 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 718 kg more than 1964 Ferrari 158.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1964 Ferrari 158 | |
| Make | Allard | Ferrari |
| Model | K3 | 158 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 462 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2390 mm |
