1952 Allard K3 vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1965 Lincoln Continental is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Allard | Lincoln |
| Model | K3 | Continental |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4375 cc | 7048 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 284 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |
