1952 Allard K3 vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 1966 DAF Daffodil is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Allard K3 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Allard K3 should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Allard K3 weights approximately 514 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Allard K3 | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Allard | DAF |
| Model | K3 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 95 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 33 L |
