1952 Allard K3 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Allard | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | K3 | 280 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 78.7 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |