1952 Allard K3 vs. 1977 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1977 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 5,031 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 770 kg more than 1952 Allard K3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1977 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K3 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1952 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3090 mm |