1952 Allard K3 vs. 1981 Ford Probe
To start off, 1981 Ford Probe is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Probe weights approximately 190 kg more than 1952 Allard K3.
Because 1952 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Ford Probe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard K3 (218 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Probe. (148 Nm). This means 1952 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Probe. 1981 Ford Probe has automatic transmission and 1952 Allard K3 has manual transmission. 1952 Allard K3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Probe will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1981 Ford Probe | |
Make | Allard | Ford |
Model | K3 | Probe |
Year Released | 1952 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 148 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 55 L |