1952 Allard K3 vs. 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser
To start off, 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser (97 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1952 Allard K3. (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard K3.
Because 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser (226 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Allard K3. (218 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Allard K3 | 1988 Toyota Land Cruiser | |
Make | Allard | Toyota |
Model | K3 | Land Cruiser |
Year Released | 1952 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 3429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 95 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 226 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.8 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 105 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |